Trang chủInternational FootballMoney doesn't win titles: The U23 wave is rewriting V-League's order in 2026/25

Money doesn't win titles: The U23 wave is rewriting V-League's order in 2026/25

V-League 2024/25 chứng kiến sự trỗi dậy của các CLB trẻ hóa như HAGL, Hà Nội FC, Bình Dương. Họ đạt hiệu quả cao nhờ chi phí thấp và thể lực tốt, trong khi các đội giàu như CAHN, Nam Định chật vật vì phụ thuộc ngoại binh. Đây là tín hiệu chuyển dịch quyền lực của giải đấu. Key facts: - V-League 2024/25 lượt đi: HAGL nằm trong top 5 dù ngân sách thấp. - Cầu thủ U23 di chuyển trung bình 11,6 km/trận, cao hơn ngoại binh 1,2 km. - CAHN liên tục thay HLV dù chi tiêu lớn. - Bài viết dự đoán CLB có 3+ cầu thủ U23 đá chính sẽ kết thúc top 5. Source: VuaBong.vn tổng hợp từ quan sát trực tiếp mùa giải 2024/25 | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn Q&A: - Vì sao HAGL không chi lớn vẫn đua top đầu? Nhờ sử dụng hiệu quả cầu thủ trẻ lò đào tạo và lối chơi pressing tầm cao. - CAHN thất bại vì đâu? Chi tiền mua ngôi sao nhưng thiếu ổn định chiến thuật và xoay vòng. - Bài học cho V-League? Cần khuyến khích các CLB tin dùng cầu thủ nội trẻ thay vì phụ thuộc ngoại binh.

People need data to predict. I just look at the crowd and go the other way. As V-League 2026/25 closed its first leg, the standings spoke: a club that signed no expensive star was sitting in the top five, while the club that spent hundreds of billions of dong on national-team players and overseas Vietnamese was languishing in the bottom half. The crowd will tell me: "That's just early-season luck." I see it as a sign of a shift that league owners are trying to ignore. Look at the big picture. V-League has 14 teams, 26 rounds, and was once celebrated as a league of financial empires. Cong An Hanoi won 2026 with a bottomless wallet. Thép Xanh Nam Định won 2026 thanks to quality foreign signings and an experienced squad. This season, both are paying for the old belief: Nam Định has dropped points against younger sides, while CAHN keeps changing coaches and losing direction because of marquee signings that never settled. A pandemic does not cancel sport. It smashes the old model to make room for the fast mover. The fast mover here is not the one throwing the most money, but the one who sees that Vietnamese football's trajectory is being rewritten by the generation born 2026–2026. Based on my experience following matches in the first half of the season, I counted at least four clubs using U23 players as a core strategy, not as a stopgap. HAGL, mocked for "selling all its stars," is running a high-pressing game with faces from its Hàm Rồng academy. Hà Nội FC, after a terrible start, has rejuvenated its squad and stayed in the top four. Becamex Bình Dương and Đông Á Thanh Hóa, not the richest clubs, keep rotating to give young players game time. In contrast, in the relegation zone, teams reliant on foreign signings often list just one U23 player as a bench warmer. The difference is not about loving young players; it is about opportunity cost. An average foreign player in V-League costs about 400,000 USD per season, excluding signing fees and injury risk. A good academy batch can produce 5–6 U23 players ready to step up at a fraction of that cost. Young local players are not just cheaper; they run more. In live matches I have tracked, local U23 players averaged 11.6 km per game, about 1.2 km more than foreign players in similar positions. In a league with such pace and harsh weather, what decides points from the 80th minute onward is not skill, but stamina. The side with fresh young legs controls the tempo. The rich clubs are making an obvious tactical mistake: they build squads that are too old and too dependent on individuals. When opponents neutralize their foreign striker or overseas-Vietnamese playmaker, the whole system jams. I once wrote: "In the transfer market, reputation is the easiest currency to launder." CAHN is the living proof: signing many national team players, but lacking cohesion and intensity, they are easily decoded. The young teams, meanwhile, use fluid 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 shapes, constantly swapping positions and pressing the opponent's half. They do not need a superstar to score from space; they create space with speed and constant movement. Of course, I can be wrong. Young teams often lack nerve in the final stretch; an injury to one young pillar can bring the whole collective down. Rich owners could simply buy up the young generation, as CAHN did with Nguyễn Đình Bắc born in 2026, turning other academies into feeder stations. If the federation does not strictly enforce youth-appearance rules, V-League could fall back into the old loop: a few rich clubs taking turns winning the title while the rest just show up. But I am ready to bet on the opposite. Guangzhou taught me: money can't buy the match, but it can buy the people standing next to the pitch. In V-League, money buys temporary trophies, but not a generation. The question is not whether rich clubs will keep dominating. The question is: who is the fastest mover quietly collecting the best 19- and 20-year-olds from provinces across the country? In three years, when these U23 cohorts reach their prime, the league's order will be rewritten by the very players who are sitting on the bench today. I am watching this wave from the stands, and I am not blinking.

Money doesn't win titles: The U23 wave is rewriting V-League's order in 2026/25

Money doesn't win titles: The U23 wave is rewriting V-League's order in 2026/25